[ Post che necessita di avere in mente cosa sia il Semantic Web e RDF... ]
Ho appena scovato un interessante spunto di riflessione sull’uso di RDF e sulla sua effettiva apertura e solidita’…
-> Public RDF – Contextual Dissent about Any Articulation
L’autore di questo commento si e’ reso conto che guardando lo stack del semantic web ci sono alcune cose implicite, poste in modo errato
Sapendo che e’ tutt’altro che un sistema perfetto ci si chiede se la struttura proposta soffra di una visione non del tutto ottimale…
In particolare si parla del contesto…
Yet, in a public media like the Web, on a network of peers like the Internet, the same public name may be described differently by a resource depending on the context in which it is named.
An apple is not a fruit everywhere (not in this context
Hierarchical and centralized, DNS is just good enough to resolve private names of public network resources.
Although it is mostly wide open to abuse, its reliability is a question of perception and the benefits of its applications (e-mail, the web, etc) far outweight its costs in fraud and spam.
But there is no way for DNS to handle public names of contextual resources.Who should have authority about the apple DNS domain?
Somebody, nobody or everybody?
